Agenda and minutes
Venue: Council Chamber, Town Hall, Katharine Street, Croydon CR0 1NX. View directions
Contact: Jayde Watts
020 8726 6000 x52729/Tariq Aniemeka-Bailey
020 8726 6000 x64109
Email: jayde.watts@croydon.gov.uk / Email: tariq.aniemeka-bailey@croydon.gov.uk
No. | Item |
---|---|
Minutes of Previous Meeting PDF 348 KB To approve the minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 24 March 2022 as an accurate record. Minutes: RESOLVED that the minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 24 March 2022 be signed as a correct record.
|
|
Disclosure of Interest Members and co-opted Members of the Council are reminded that, in accordance with the Council’s Code of Conduct and the statutory provisions of the Localism Act, they are required to consider in advance of each meeting whether they have a disclosable pecuniary interest (DPI), an other registrable interest (ORI) or a non-registrable interest (NRI) in relation to any matter on the agenda. If advice is needed, Members should contact the Monitoring Officer in good time before the meeting.
If any Member or co-opted Member of the Council identifies a DPI or ORI which they have not already registered on the Council’s register of interests or which requires updating, they should complete the disclosure form which can be obtained from Democratic Services at any time, copies of which will be available at the meeting for return to the Monitoring Officer.
Members and co-opted Members are required to disclose any DPIs and ORIs at the meeting.
· Where the matter relates to a DPI they may not participate in any discussion or vote on the matter and must not stay in the meeting unless granted a dispensation. · Where the matter relates to an ORI they may not vote on the matter unless granted a dispensation. · Where a Member or co-opted Member has an NRI which directly relates to their financial interest or wellbeing, or that of a relative or close associate, they must disclose the interest at the meeting, may not take part in any discussion or vote on the matter and must not stay in the meeting unless granted a dispensation. Where a matter affects the NRI of a Member or co-opted Member, section 9 of Appendix B of the Code of Conduct sets out the test which must be applied by the Member to decide whether disclosure is required.
The Chair will invite Members to make their disclosure orally at the commencement of Agenda item 3, to be recorded in the minutes. Minutes: There were no disclosures of a pecuniary interest not already registered.
|
|
Urgent Business (if any) To receive notice of any business not on the agenda which in the opinion of the Chair, by reason of special circumstances, be considered as a matter of urgency. Minutes: There was none. |
|
Development presentations PDF 108 KB To receive the following presentations on a proposed development:
There are none. Minutes: There were none. |
|
Planning applications for decision PDF 148 KB To consider the accompanying reports by the Director of Planning & Strategic Transport:
Additional documents: |
|
21/03908/FUL - 66 Pollards Hill North, Norbury, SW16 4NY PDF 113 KB Demolition of existing dwellinghouse building and provision of residential accommodation (Class C3) comprising the erection of 9 two storey houses with rooms in roof space facing onto Pollards Hill North and Beech Road, with associated landscaping, refuse and recycling storage and cycle and car parking.
Ward: Norbury and Pollards Hill Recommendation: Grant permission Additional documents: Minutes: Demolition of existing dwellinghouse building and provision of residential accommodation (Class C3) comprising the erection of 9 two storey houses with rooms in roof space facing onto Pollards Hill North and Beech Road, with associated landscaping, refuse and recycling storage and cycle and car parking.
Ward: Norbury and Pollards Hill
The officer presented details of the planning application and responded to questions for clarification.
Ms Margaret Robson spoke against the application.
Mr Simon Erland was unable to attend the Planning Committtee meeting in time to speak in objection to the application. The Chair used his discretion to allow another resident (Ms Margaret Robson) to read out Mr Erlands’ written statement to the committee in his absence.
Mr Richard Quelch & Mr Alex Wythespoke in support of the application.
The Committee deliberated on the application presentation heard before them having heard all the speakers who addressed the Committee, and in turn addressed their view on the matter.
The substantive motion to GRANT the application based on the officer’s recommendation was proposed by Councillor Joy Prince. This was seconded by Councillor Humayun Kabir.
The motion to grant the application was taken to a vote and carried with four Members voting in favour, four Members voting against and one Member abstained their vote.
The chair used his casting vote to vote in favour of the application.
The Committee RESOLVED to GRANT the application for the development at 66 Pollards Hill North, Norbury.
|
|
21/05562/FUL - 48 Maberley Road, Upper Norwood, London, SE19 2JA PDF 116 KB Demolition of existing dwelling house and construction of new replacement building comprising 8 residential flats with associated cycle parking, waste stores and landscaping.
Ward: Crystal Palace and Upper Norwood Recommendation: Grant permission Additional documents: Minutes: Demolition of existing dwelling house and construction of new replacement building comprising 8 residential flats with associated cycle parking, waste stores and landscaping.
Ward: Crystal Palace and Upper Norwood
The officer presented details of the planning application and responded to questions for clarification.
Mr Jon Head spoke against the application.
Mr Chris Scarr spoke in support of the application.
The Committee deliberated on the application presentation heard before them having heard all the speakers who addressed the Committee, and in turn addressed their view on the matter.
The substantive motion to GRANT the application based on the officer’s recommendation was not supported.
Councillor Fraser proposed the motion to refuse the application due to the proposed development by reason of its height, depth, scale and mass would represent an overdevelopment of the site which would have a harmful impact on the amenities of adjoining occupiers by reason of overlooking and its overbearing nature. This was seconded by Councillor Hale.
The motion to refuse the application was taken to a vote ad carried with seven Members voting in favour, no Members voting against and two Members abstaining their vote.
The Committee RESOLVED to REFUSE the application for the development at 48 Maberley Road, Upper Norwood, London.
|
|
Items referred by Planning Sub-Committee To consider any item(s) referred by a previous meeting of the Planning Sub-Committee to this Committee for consideration and determination:
There are none. Minutes: There were none. |
|
Other planning matters PDF 104 KB To consider the accompanying report by the Director of Planning & Strategic Transport:
Attached is a list of Delegated and Planning Committee/Sub Committee decisions taken between 14 March 2022 and 25 March 2022. Additional documents: Minutes: There were none. |
|
Weekly Planning Decisions Minutes: The report was received for information.
|