Venue: This meeting was held remotely via Microsoft Teams.
Contact: Stephanie Davis
02087266000 x84384 Email: email@example.com
Apologies for absence
To receive any apologies for absence from any members of the Committee.
Apologies received from Elaine Jones and Paul O’Donnell
To approve the minutes of the meetings held on 2 March 2021 and 20 April 2021 (to follow) as an accurate record.
The minutes of the meeting of 20 April 2020 was agreed as an accurate record.
Disclosures of interest
In accordance with the Council’s Code of Conduct and the statutory provisions of the Localism Act, Members and co-opted Members of the Council are reminded that it is a requirement to register disclosable pecuniary interests (DPIs) and gifts and hospitality to the value of which exceeds £50 or multiple gifts and/or instances of hospitality with a cumulative value of £50 or more when received from a single donor within a rolling twelve month period. In addition, Members and co-opted Members are reminded that unless their disclosable pecuniary interest is registered on the register of interests or is the subject of a pending notification to the Monitoring Officer, they are required to disclose those disclosable pecuniary interests at the meeting. This should be done by completing the Disclosure of Interest form and handing it to the Democratic Services representative at the start of the meeting. The Chair will then invite Members to make their disclosure orally at the commencement of Agenda item 3. Completed disclosure forms will be provided to the Monitoring Officer for inclusion on the Register of Members’ Interests.
There were none.
Urgent Business (if any)
To receive notice of any business not on the agenda which in the opinion of the Chair, by reason of special circumstances, be considered as a matter of urgency.
There was none.
Action list update
Discussion on actions arising from previous meetings.
A presentation on Croydon’s Covid response and offer to support emotional wellbeing and mental health of children and young people.
The Head of Commissioning and Procurement introduced the item, with invited guests outlining details in a Presentation.
Following the presentations, Members’ had the opportunity to raise questions.
In response to a question on when services would resume face to face contact with children and young people, Members were informed that services were slowly increasing the amount of face to face contact. All contact was completed under strict Covid guidelines using correct PPE. It had emerged that some young people preferred online contact and this was still being offered. The Single Point of Contact service continued to receive referrals throughout the pandemic although there was a significant reduction in the early stages, referrals were now increasing to pre pandemic levels.
It was further asked what the figures of children contacted weekly by services were and Members were informed that services were back up to 60% face to face contact. Many young people preferred the alternative means of contact as some did not want to travel to offices in central Croydon at this time. Both Croydon Drop In and Off the Record have always worked on a self-referral basis and this had not changed.
In relation to contact with younger children, Members were advised that at least 50% of children worked with were between the ages of 10-13. The advantage of other means of contact such as telephone was that therapist were able to engage with parents of carers which may not have been the case previously.
A Member questioned what consideration if any was being given to extend the trailblazer funding that had 30 schools involved in the project to the rest of the schools in the Borough. Members were advised that the numbers of schools involved in Trailblazers came from commissioners, most of the work to date was in primary schools and was done in conjunction with parents. It had been difficult to get secondary schools involved although they were being encouraged to participate. There was another Trailblazer project running across South West London for colleges and post 16. It was important to note that there wasn’t a school in the Borough demanding to be involved that was not yet involved.
In response to a question on what mechanisms were in place to capture hidden harm and what support there was available for children and families, officers said that there were several routes for young people to contact and seek support. Partners were working to streamline pathways in order to ensure they were clear and accessible. Investigations were taking place at national level to capture what was happening through surveys which gave insight to what was occurring. One of the lessons learnt was for agencies not to make assumptions and that whilst there had been an increase in hidden harm, this was not actually in the cohort of children that were previously know or were accessing services. Those deeply affected by events of the pandemic were children that had not previously accessed services.
It was asked if there were ... view the full minutes text for item 38/21
To receive an overview of the staff changes, service impact and response to the budget reductions of the department. .
The Interim Director of Early Help and Children’s Social Care introduced the report and the following was noted:
The sub-committee had the opportunity to ask questions
It was commented that there had been a noted increase in exclusions and officers responded that it had since been identified that six had been rescinded and a request would be made to the Interim Director of Education to provide further information as to the reasons behind the decision.
It was asked how Croydon Music and Arts was being funded as the £13k for the service had been removed from the General Fund. Officers said that this was correct as there was no longer additional funding from the Council for the service as it was able to operate without it. Croydon Music and Arts was self-funding, primarily through grants, which was in common with other LA’s.
An update was requested on the departments Transformation Funding. Officers said transformation funding had been utilised for transformation purposes only, with extensive work undertaken to ensure this. There had been success with a number of bids and there remained stringent reviews of spending. There had been success in support for short term court work teams to address loss of expert capacity in social work for families. There was targeted work on recruitment and retention with a focus on use of diverse media. There was some short term capacity on foster care department.
It was asked what the alternative would be if the departments could not achieve the savings indicated in the report. Officers said that in being transparent at the end of period two and if the identified savings were not made, the reality was that the savings would have to be found elsewhere.
It was requested that officers start reporting identified additional savings in the event that savings could not be achieved once finalised as it was expected that officers should have commenced discussions on the proposals.
The Chair added that through offline robust discussions that had taken place, he was reassured on the transparency of activities of the service that had been reported.
A Member commented that building skills in fostering was crucial to ensure future savings could be made and improve services for the children and families ... view the full minutes text for item 39/21
(Report to follow)
The Interim Director of Improvement and Quality introduced the report and the following was noted:
There was challenge on equalities outcomes and how this was ensured for children and families. It was asked how this outcome would be captured. Officers said that this was also a point made by the staff representative improvement board. It was acknowledged that this has not been addressed in the report and a meeting was being convened by officers to discuss this point and how to positively promote equality as part of the work being done
It was commented that the report had indicated projects that had dropped off and items that were at risk, the detail behind this had to be made clearer in future reporting.
It was commented that dialogue was needed on presentation of the quarterly report prior to the next meeting.
Members were encouraged to send further comments as indicated in the report by 29 June 2021
The Chair thanked officers for their attendance and responses to questions.
In reaching its recommendations, the Sub-Committee came to the following conclusions:
1. The sub-committee welcomed the proposals on a quarterly progress report being included in its work programme.
2. It was clear that further work needed to be done on governance assurance, strengthening of interface with the sub-committee without duplication.
3. The Plan was lacking in detailing achievement of equalities outcomes for children.
4. It would appear on the report that some projects had ‘dropped off’ and with limited detail as to the reason. Reassurance was needed on the reason why those projects had ‘dropped off’.
The Sub-Committee recommended that
1. The Chair work closely with officers on what the quarterly progress report that would be presented to the committee would look like.
2. That quarterly reports detail all completed projects or projects that had ‘dropped off’ and the reasons for this
3. The Improvement Plan detail achievement of equalities outcomes for children and families.
report by 29 June 2021.
The Chair thanked officers for the attendance and responses to questions.
(Presentation to follow)
The Executive Director for Children Families and Education introduced the item and outlined details in a Presentation.
Following the presentation, Members had the opportunity to ask questions.
The Chair summarised that:
It was commented that there was uncertainty as to whether this meeting was a pre decision Scrutiny exercise or just an information giving exercise. Officers said that there were two issues for consideration, the need to reduce the number of UASC children in Croydon and also the funding gap. Solutions were being sought for both issues and a decision would have to be taken to reduce the pressure on Croydon. The Cabinet Member for Children Families and Education added that the issues presented a number of complexities, the details of which were being presented for noting by Scrutiny at this stage to bring awareness that decisions on safeguarding and risk may have to be taken where relevant with little notice. There would be an opportunity for further discussions but it was vital that Scrutiny had early oversight of the situation.
In response to a question on what measure were in place to maintain the budget , officers said that they were working towards ensuring that they could get the best value for placements but more needed to be done in this area.
It was clear that a meeting would need to take place to discuss the matter in detail and it was agreed for an informal meeting to take place in the coming weeks to discuss the options in greater depth.
In reaching its recommendation the Sub-Committee came to the following conclusions:
What difference has this meeting made to Croydon's children
To discuss the findings from this meeting and expectations for Croydon’s Children.
Following discussions, the sub-committee agreed that:
The work programme was discussed and it was agreed the work programme for 2021/22 was flexible and there was a need for an understanding of how Scrutiny fits in with the work being completed by Cabinet, General Purpose and Audit Committee as well as the Children’s Improvement Board in order to alleviate instances of duplication.
In reference to the Scrutiny Annual report 2020/2021 which had been published and could be found here, it was agreed that Members were confident in their ability to continue to hold the executive and cabinet member to account, It was vital that the sub-committee continue to maintain sight of the budget, ensure that officers were maintaining a sustainable and safe delivery of service.