The
Interim Executive Director of Place introduced the item and details
were outlined by relevant Directors in a
Presentation
Following the presentation, Members had the opportunity to ask
questions
During the consideration of the recommendations, the Committee
discussed the following:
-
Growth on income had been built into the budget in
relation to ANPR cameras, camera enforcement was an efficient way
to ensure people were abiding by the law. Income for enforcement
would be a significant increase on previous years. Parking income
was used to offset concessionary travel such as the freedom pass
scheme which contribution for is laid to London
Councils
-
Once motorists start to comply with restrictions,
there may be a reduction in projected revenue from penalty charges
in areas where ANPR ‘s operated.
This had been built into the model as income projection was based
on a compliance process which had been over and under estimated at
different periods.
-
After the deduction of the cost of running the
service, all surplus funds goes into the freedom pass scheme, once
the surplus exceeds the cost of the freedom pass, the Council is
required to put the funds into other road schemes.
-
The Council has shifted from a reactive service on
maintenance of highways. The budget to deal with reactive
maintenance such as effects of potholes as a result of adverse
weather was amended to allow for growth in the budget to allow for
the repairs to be made.
-
The majority of money for Croydon works initially
came from the growth fund
-
The end of furlough and reversal of uplift to
universal credit was concerning and there were a number of
strategies that had been out in place by the Council to mitigate
the knock on effect such as additional funding which had been
secured from DWP to keep Croydon Works running. Working with adult
learning, Croydon College and John Ruskin colleges to ensure
delivering what needed for residents in terms of training. Working
with DWP and other providers such as SWLP to blend different
approaches from different providers.
-
The development of the community safety strategy
would address and target resources in the right way in the
antisocial behaviour teams. In being very clear about roles and
responsibilities, work had been undertaken to ensure that queries
were being routed to the right departments to make sure queries
were dealt with more quickly and efficiently. All information on
had been made clear on the Councils website.
Request for information
-
Briefing from Public Realm on projected income from
ANPR
-
Briefing on fee income and total expenditure on the
Planning Service
The
Sub-Committee concluded that
-
The Place department always achieved savings as
required. There was however a concern about the impact this was
having on the department such as the increase in complaints in some
of its service areas. Consideration to be given to the possibility
of a deep dive to be undertaken by the Sub-Committee on plans to
address issues arising from cuts to the budget to be
undertaken.
-
There was a concern about the impact of non-
compliance with planning conditions as well as issues with the
planning enforcement team resource.
-
That’s a report on Landlord Licensing be
brought before the Sub- Committee prior to being presented at
Cabinet in November 20201
-
The proactive partnership of all agencies was
reassuring