Issue - meetings

Issues and Options Consultation on the Croydon Local Plan Review

Meeting: 21/10/2019 - Cabinet (Item 91)

91 Issues and Options Consultation on the Croydon Local Plan Review pdf icon PDF 1 MB

Officer: Shifa Mustafa

Key decision: Yes

Additional documents:

Decision:

The Leader of the Council delegated authority to the Cabinet to make the following decisions:

 

RESOLVED: To

 

1.    Approve the publication of the Croydon Local Plan Review (Issues and Options) consultation document (at Appendix 1 of the report) for public consultation under the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning)(England) Regulations 2012; and

 

2.    Delegate minor and/or factual changes to the Croydon Local Plan Review (Issues and Options) consultation document prior to publication for consultation to the Director of the Director of Planning and Strategic Transport in consultation with the Cabinet Member for Environment, Transport and Regeneration (Job Share).

Minutes:

The Cabinet Member for Environment, Transport & Regeneration (Job Share, non-voting) introduced the report and showed a presentation to Cabinet regarding the Consultation on the Croydon Local Plan Review and the key drivers for reviewing; climate change, the housing crisis, new London Plan, and sustainable growth.

 

Members were informed that climate change was a key priority and driver for the review. There was a growing population and an increasing demand for smaller homes; 46,000 new homes needed to be delivered in the next 20 years due to the housing crisis. From 1600 hours on 21 October 2019 (the day of Croydon Cabinet) the panel of inspectors who were reviewing the London Plan had published their findings, and following the Mayor of London’s consideration the final report it would be published by the end of 2019. The significant finding was that the housing delivering in London had reduced from 65,000 to 52,000 new homes due to the concerns from the inspectors of the intensification in the suburbs. It was expected that there would be a reduction of new homes in Croydon; however, the consultation would continue with the draft plan to provide 29,490 new homes in ten years. Sustainable growth was imperative to provide homes and protect the distinct places in the Borough.

 

The Cabinet Member for Environment, Transport & Regeneration (Job Share, non-voting) noted that the strategic options included in the consultation were: to introduce all new homes in an urban area, creating a more intensive development in a few suburban areas, to intensify the Purley Way to deliver up to 12,000 new homes, or to release limited areas of Green Belt for housing. The level of change would vary from place to place but the areas which could accommodate further homes had been suggested, especially those with strong transport links.

 

It was further explained to Cabinet that the transformation of the Purley Way would include the retention of businesses and industry areas. The Mayor of London had granted Croydon Council just over £300k to develop a master plan for the Purley Way area. The development of the Green Belt for housing was controversial and not preferable; however, a number of stakeholders, residents and resident associations had requested that this was part of the consultation.

 

The Cabinet Member for Environment, Transport & Regeneration (Job Share, non-voting) explained that there was a climate emergency and there had been significant flooding in some areas of Croydon. Through the development of new homes the Council would support the London Plan and drive towards zero carbon development, begin reforestation in the borough, enable sustainable refurbishment of existing housing stock and ensure new builds had sustainable urban drainage systems. There was high concentration of Green Grid in the south of the borough and the Local Plan would include the retention of the natural environment and would include a net gain in biodiversity through the new developments. He added that the Council would want to work with communities to protect important green spaces.

 

The consultation was due to  ...  view the full minutes text for item 91