To demolish the existing
buildings and erect a development to provide approximately 450
residential units (Use Class C3, as build to rent), internal and
external amenity space, together with associated wheelchair
accessible vehicle parking, cycle parking, landscaping, play areas
and works.
Ward: Addiscombe
West
Councillor Fitzsimons arrived in the chamber at
6.18pm.
Councillor Kabir arrived in the chamber at 6.19pm.
Raj Kotecha and Simon Toplis
attended to give a presentation and respond to Members' questions
and issues raised for further consideration, prior to the formal
submission of a planning application.
The Members of the Committee
viewed a model of the scheme and environs immediately after Mr
Kotecha and Mr Toplis gave their presentation, prior to any
questions or feedback from Members.
The Ward Councillor, Councillor
Hay-Justice, addressed the committee with her view on the proposed
development. The below gives a summary:
- There are three tall
buildings in place already close to the site
- The proposed
development would dominate the skyline of the local
area
- Impact on NLA
tower
- View of the NLA tower
from Park Hill park would be blocked
- Height and mass were
incongruent with residents’ homes where there typically
traditional low rise homes
- The towers were far
too high
- The potential 450
households would intensify the site
- High turnover of
residents could increase the amount of fly tipping
- Integrity of water
supply and space for evacuation
- Minimal communal
space
The main issues raised at this
meeting by Members of the Committee were as follows:
Principle
- Sorry for loss of
much-loved Hotel
- Prime location 200m
from East Croydon station
- Do not want site
derelict and abandoned
- Loss of employment
from loss of hotel
- Need for
housing
- Questioned whether
student accommodation had been considered
Height
- Site can take some
height, but a concern at this height could set a
precedent
- Concerned not part of
the cluster of tall buildings, distinction between sides of the
railway line
- Height more akin to
NLA Tower, Altitude 25 and Pocket could be more
appropriate
Design
- Should not compete
with NLA Tower
- Materiality competes,
should consider a softer palette
- Contrast between
surroundings is too much of a change
- Needs to relate
better to Pocket and Altitude 25
- Questions around
terracotta and materials
- Balcony materials
important - linked to privacy
- Relationship between
blocks successful and design works
Affordable housing
- Questions around
location, type, service charges, use of facilities and maintenance
and whether secured in perpetuity
- Questioned where 20%
has come from and need for viability to have been worked
through
Mix
and standard
- Questioned mix beyond
family provision - seems quite a high proportion of
one-bed
- Dual aspect units
important
- Questions around
Build to Rent experience of the developer
- Pollution from the
road and impact for future occupiers
- Spaces needed for
different uses, including prayer and disabled/elderly
Residential impact
- Residents concerned
about what is coming forward
- Questioned how the
scheme has amended through consultation
- Questions around
microclimate and noise
- Daylight and sunlight
impacts need to be considered, bearing in mind lower rise in
Altyre Road
- Relationship to
Altitude 25 important
Public realm
- Generosity of
pavement and public realm needed
- Welcome public realm
approach of green link and tree retention
- Links to Park Hill
should be improved - suggestion of working with Park Hill community
groups
- Blue infrastructure
important
Other
- Car parking numbers
and impact on congestion
- Refuse and bulky
items need to be factored in
- Support the
sustainability approach
- Questioned the name
of the development